KDevelop is a feature-full, plugin extensible IDE for C/C++ and many other programming languages. Qt is used for developing cross-platform apps and graphical user interfaces (GUIs) that run on most mobile, desktop or embedded platforms.I'm building an application for multiple desktop platforms: Windows, Mac, and maybe later for Linux.Extensible, Cross-Platform. Released in 1995, Qt is an open-source widget toolkit for creating cross-platform apps and GUIs for Android, iOS, Windows, macOS, Linux and embedded systems using C++.Programming language need to be whether C# (preferred) or Java. Afreqshift and aphaseshift filters High Voltage Software ADPCM encoder.I was wondering which programming language and IDE combination would be the best for me: CLX (Component Library for Cross-platform) was used with Borland s (now Embarcadero s) Delphi , C++ Builder , and Kylix , for producing cross-platform applications between Windows and Linux.A complete, cross-platform solution to record, convert and stream audio and. A Carbon (OS X) port is underway.
![]() ![]() If it's a complex ERP then Java is good. If it's a 3-screen utility program, avoid Java. But for enterprisey apps the main concern is that the very intense business logic will work. You might not have end-users love you given Java apps tend to eat up memory. By the time you read this, Flutter may be the best choice.B2B: Java? This is a pretty tried, tested and true solution for "heavy" enterprise apps. I have used it in both Windows and Mac and it's great. It's a great example of making a reasonable desktop app in Java. Again, one Java desktop app I like is Freemind. From making the GUI, to better code completion, to faster compile times, to less packaging and install snags. NET Windows desktop development is about 2X-4X faster development time than Windows Java desktop development. The key is, in my biased view. NET? There is so much to unpack here. But please first build a basic. If it's an enterprise app, you might be able to get away with using. NET Core to provide a full suite for MacOS without the limitations and it hasn't yet happened. But I've been waiting years for Mono or. I really, really hope this changes. Mac mini n64 emulatorOverall Notes on Cross PlatformIf this is a smaller app which doesn't need a fantastic UX and super-deep OS integration, then I'd consider Xojo or LiveCode, perhaps for the UX elements. You may find you're struggling in this area today (although I hope it gets better, it hasn't for years). Then try building an installer for it on MacOS, and find someone random with a Mac to see if it actually installs and runs. So for a small app or utility- an XML editor, IT helper tool, Xojo or perhaps LiveCode will help you get there sooner.When you hit the build button on Xojo, for example, it literally makes 3 executable files for Windows, Mac and Linux. You have a lot of costs of keeping up with the Joneses and maintaining installers. NET and QT changes all the time. They are more about keeping things consistent. What happens if you get laid off and have 5 years of experience in Xojo? Hmm.In your evaluation, no matter what you choose- you must compile a basic GUI app in the platform you're evaluating and get 3 people to install it correctly on a Mac. Many developers wont want to code in Xojo or LiveCode because they are lesser known languages. NET although LiveCode is a different programming paradigm entirely based on "stacks".Keep in mind developer happiness too. You can read around their forums. NET app for Windows, to be honest.The tradeoff is these tools- Xojo and LiveCode often end to be missing a few critical things you need, requiring a bit of a hack. Creative suite cs3 keygen macNever mind GUI consistency. Especially if you're a web developer, you'd see that just maintaining installers is a ton of work across 3 platforms.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorKaren ArchivesCategories |